Debate in NASCAR: Practice time for NASCAR Cup drivers has significantly dwindled since the 2020 season, initially comprising three 50-minute sessions before reducing to two, owing largely to the upheaval caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic. However, the persistence of this regulation across subsequent seasons has split opinions within the paddock. Some drivers endorse the reduction in practice time, while others advocate for more on-track sessions.
A notable concern emerges regarding the potential detriment to rookie drivers in the Cup Series. In motorsport, newcomers require time to adapt to the cars, with practice sessions serving as invaluable opportunities to acquaint themselves with tracks and fine-tune their setups.
Michael McDowell expressed his opinion on the necessity of practice, revealing a somewhat unorthodox perspective. “I wish we didn’t have practice at all,” he candidly remarked. Acknowledging differing preferences, McDowell acknowledged the benefits for bigger teams in maximizing their car potential and setup. He highlighted how extended practice sessions favor resource-rich teams equipped with extensive technological support.
Contrarily, McDowell, representing Front Row Motorsports, perceives the absence or reduction of practice as advantageous. He believes it levels the playing field, enabling smaller teams to challenge their more financially endowed counterparts. Ricky Stenhouse Jr echoed a similar sentiment, admitting to occasional desires for more practice while recognizing the inherent difficulties for single-car teams competing against larger counterparts.
Stenhouse Jr also acknowledged the challenge rookies face due to the lack of practice, notably stemming from differences between Xfinity Series, Trucks, and Cup cars. However, with consistency in Cup car models across tracks, rookies may adapt within a span of several races.
Offering a contrasting viewpoint, Brad Keselowski, both a driver and a team owner since 2022, sees value in more practice. He highlighted the perceived cost savings and increased competitiveness as potential benefits, albeit with mixed outcomes. Keselowski’s stance considers the advantages of on-track sessions, particularly from an owner’s perspective, yet he acknowledges the potential challenges for newer drivers unaccustomed to Cup cars.
The contrasting opinions among drivers raise important considerations, especially regarding the impact on rookie drivers adapting to the Cup Series. While drivers like Ty Gibbs and Noah Gragson managed to adapt successfully, the same may not apply universally to upcoming rookie drivers.
The diverging opinions from seasoned drivers like Keselowski and McDowell open a debate: Should NASCAR favor more or less practice time? The answer remains subjective, dependent on multiple factors impacting both seasoned and rookie drivers alike.
ALSO READ: NASCAR Noise Debate: Kyle Larson Backs Mufflers for Next Gen Cars
