back to top

The ‘Back Gate’ Revenue Failing Grassroots Racing? A Former Track Owner Speaks Out!

The ‘Back Gate’ revenue failing grassroots racing has become a serious concern, and one former track owner is speaking out about it. For years, grassroots racing has depended on this income, but the challenges are growing. With fewer fans showing up and sponsors backing away, is the future of local tracks in danger? This former insider gives us a behind-the-scenes look at what’s really going on and why the survival of grassroots racing could be at risk.

Key Highlights

  • Ken Schrader highlights financial challenges as grassroots racing struggles with decreasing sponsorships and TV deals.
  • Diminished event attendance affects both fan engagement and potential sponsorship interest in grassroots racing.
  • Rising operational costs, including insurance and energy, surpass ticket sales and participant fee revenues.
  • Grassroots racing’s survival depends on community support and innovative financial strategies.
  • Lack of TV coverage and sponsorships threatens the sustainability of local tracks and teams.

The Struggles of Grassroots Racing

Grassroots racing, the bedrock of motorsport culture, faces considerable challenges that threaten its very existence. The essence of grassroots racing lies in its accessibility and the pure passion it invokes among fans and drivers similarly. Yet, this foundational aspect of the sport is at a crossroads, with several factors contributing to its precarious state.

One of the primary issues stems from the restrictions imposed by NASCAR teams, which have increasingly barred their star drivers from participating in events outside the premier series. This decision impacts grassroots racing profoundly, as fans are deprived of witnessing their favorite drivers return to their roots, reminiscent of Christopher Bell’s celebrated victory at Tulsa. Such appearances not only enhance event attendance but also inspire young drivers by showcasing a pathway to the top echelons of the sport.

Moreover, the insights from NASCAR veterans Kenny Wallace and Ken Schrader provide a revealing look into the operational difficulties faced by grassroots racing venues. Schrader, with his extensive experience as a track owner, highlights the multifaceted challenges of maintaining and running a successful track.

These include financial constraints, dwindling spectator numbers, and the ever-present necessity of managing operational costs. The decline in grassroots racing events is a reflection of these unresolved issues, exacerbated by the lack of support from higher-tier entities.

Ken Schrader's Critique Reveals NASCAR's Struggles

The Challenges of Sponsorship and TV Viewership

As grassroots racing continues to navigate its financial landscape, the dual challenges of securing sponsorships and attracting TV viewership present considerable obstacles to its sustainability.

At its core, grassroots racing relies heavily on sponsorships to keep the wheels turning. Sponsors provide vital funding, often in exchange for branding opportunities on race cars. However, the diminishing viewership of these events has led to a decrease in sponsorship interest. Brands are hesitant to invest in a platform where their visibility is not guaranteed, questioning the return on investment.

Television broadcasting, another key revenue stream, faces similar challenges. Networks are less inclined to purchase broadcasting rights for events that draw minimal audiences. This reluctance is exacerbated by examples like Vado Speedway Park, where sparse attendance highlights the declining popularity of grassroots racing.

Without substantial viewership, TV deals become less lucrative, creating a vicious cycle that further discourages sponsorship.

Kenny Wallace, on the Herm and Schrader podcast, highlighted these issues by pointing to empty grandstands, sparking a discussion with Ken Schrader about the intricacies of maintaining sponsorships.

“I want you to speak to the sponsorship and the TV viewership… I want to hear it from you because you owned a racetrack for a long time. How does that event work if nobody is in the grandstands..”- Kenny Wallace

The challenge lies not only in attracting sponsors but also in ensuring that viewership numbers justify such investments. As Schrader knows firsthand, this requires creative strategies to engage audiences and boost the sport’s profile.

Ken Schrader’s Insight into Track Ownership

Ken Schrader’s extensive experience as a track owner offers invaluable insights into the complex dynamics of grassroots racing. Having owned the Federated Autoparts Raceway I-55 in Pevely, Missouri, for 30 years, Schrader understands the multifaceted challenges involved in operating a racetrack. His insights reveal the delicate balance between participant engagement, sponsorship acquisition, and media partnerships, which are essential for sustaining a successful racing venue.

“Obviously, you need X number dollars to come in. You’re gonna have a substantial amount come in through the back gate, which is the participants. I don’t know if they had entry fees out there [Vado Speedway Park] or not, but, if you got ballpark 150 cars, they’re all bringing three or four people.” – Ken Schrader

  1. Participant Revenue: Schrader emphasizes the importance of revenue generated from participants, often referred to as the “back gate.” With approximately 150 cars participating, each accompanied by several individuals, this revenue stream is a significant component of the track’s financial model. This aspect highlights the significance of attracting a robust field of competitors to guarantee a steady income.
  2. Sponsorship and TV Deals: He highlights the necessity of securing sponsorships and television rights to improve financial viability. Media partners like Flo Racing are fundamental in broadcasting events, thereby increasing the track’s visibility. However, the sustainability of these agreements hinges on the track’s ability to attract sponsors who can draw audiences.
  3. Interdependence of Factors: Schrader articulates how these elements—participant fees, sponsorships, and media rights—interact to create a successful racing ecosystem. The intricate interdependence suggests that a shortfall in one area could impact the complete operation, emphasizing the complex nature of track ownership.

Ken Schrader's Daytona 500 Success

The Financial Strain in Grassroots Racing

Navigating the financial landscape of grassroots racing presents considerable challenges for track owners and organizers. The backbone of local racing circuits, these individuals face a formidable task as they attempt to balance budgets with limited sponsorship deals and inconsistent revenue from broadcasting rights. One of the most pressing issues is the rising cost of hosting events, which often exceeds the revenue generated from ticket sales and participant fees. This financial strain necessitates a tactical approach to sustain operations and maintain the viability of grassroots racing.

“So you got a pretty substantial back gate plus the sponsorship plus the tv rights whatever they are able to sell tv for. So someone like Flo would pay them for the right to broadcast it, thinking that they’re gonna be able to sell sponsorship and have enough people to purchase it… so everything works for everyone.” – Ken Schrader

The operational costs associated with grassroots racing have seen a notable uptick, driven by a multitude of factors including increased insurance premiums, energy costs, and regulatory compliance. Track owners are left maneuvering the precarious waters of financial management, where every dollar counts.

These financial challenges emphasize the tenuous position of grassroots racing in the broader motorsport ecosystem. Without substantial reforms or groundbreaking financial strategies, the sustainability of these local tracks remains in jeopardy.

The reliance on participant contributions, in particular, creates a cycle of dependency that is difficult to break, as racers themselves face financial strains. Consequently, track owners must continuously seek out new revenue streams and cost-saving measures to guarantee that grassroots racing can endure these economic trials.

The Importance of Sponsorship in NASCAR

Sponsorship in NASCAR is fundamental for the survival and success of its teams, as the financial demands of maintaining a competitive edge continue to escalate. The costs associated with running a NASCAR team, even at a basic level, can reach $400,000, covering expenses such as drivers, engines, crew members, and tires.

While race events themselves generate revenue through entry fees and broadcasting rights, this is not enough to sustain individual teams, making sponsorships a critical lifeline. The case of Stewart-Haas Racing (SHR) emphasizes this reality; once a championship-winning team, it disbanded in 2024 after losing considerable sponsorship support.

The dynamics of sponsorship in NASCAR have evolved, with a noticeable trend towards smaller financial contributions paired with tactical technological partnerships. This shift is reflected in NASCAR’s recent collaboration with Microsoft, which goes beyond mere financial support to include the provision of technological resources.

NASCAR's Open Exemption Rule

News in Brief: The ‘Back Gate’ Revenue Failing Grassroots Racing

Grassroots racing faces considerable challenges due to dwindling sponsorship opportunities and declining television viewership, affecting the financial viability of local tracks. Ken Schrader’s insights highlight the crucial role that sponsorship plays in sustaining these racing circuits.

The financial strain is exacerbated by the competitive nature of securing partnerships, which are fundamental for survival. Consequently, the industry must investigate creative solutions to attract sponsors and engage audiences, ensuring the longevity and vibrancy of grassroots racing.

ALSO READ: Ken Schrader Slams Racing Money Mentality in Bold Statement on True Racer Values

RELATED ARTICLES
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Follow Us

Most Recent