Key Highlights
- Dale Earnhardt Jr. questions the financial viability of transforming Fontana into a short track.
- High construction costs and California’s permitting challenges complicate the Fontana project.
- NASCAR sold Auto Club Speedway for $569 million, prioritizing commercial over racing interests.
- Concerns about market viability and audience reception in California impact project feasibility.
- NASCAR’s hesitations align with Earnhardt Jr.’s skepticism about the project’s financial prudence.
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s Early Racing Days and Connection to Fontana
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s early racing days were marked by a blend of dedication, family involvement, and considerable learning experiences on different short tracks, including Fontana. At 17, Earnhardt Jr. could be found tirelessly working on his Late Model stock car alongside his siblings, Kerry and Kelley.
The trio frequently raced at Myrtle Beach Speedway, where Earnhardt Jr. honed his skills, maneuvering through the intricacies of semi-banked asphalt circuits. His expedition also took him to Concord Speedway, North Wilkesboro Speedway, South Boston Speedway, and significantly, the Auto Club Raceway in Fontana.
Fontana held a special place in Earnhardt Jr.’s racing narrative. Here, he accumulated five top-five finishes, a reflection of his growing skill.
Despite its 2023 closure, Earnhardt Jr.’s fondness for the track endured, describing it as a fun, multifaceted racing experience. The 2-mile superspeedway’s legacy intertwines with his formative racing years, shaping much of his early career.
NASCAR’s Original Plan for Fontana and Challenges
Although NASCAR had long envisioned a transformation for the Fontana speedway, turning it into a short track has faced numerous challenges and delays. Originally announced in 2020, the project has been hindered by economic constraints such as inflation and high capital costs.
NASCAR President Steve Phelps acknowledged these hurdles in 2023, noting that the timing for construction remains uncertain. Despite the setbacks, NASCAR maintains its commitment to the Southern California market, with extensive plans and renderings already prepared.
“I would say that we are still planning on building a short track in Fontana; what the timing of that is, I don’t know. This isn’t the best time to be building based on inflation, the cost of capital, etc. But our intention is to continue to be in the Southern California market.” – Steve Phelps
West Region President Steve Allen’s recent comments in Phoenix reflect a cautious optimism, emphasizing that while the exact course of action is undecided, NASCAR remains determined to proceed when conditions allow.
“We’re going to do something. I just don’t know what and when yet.” – Steve Allen
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s Concerns About the Fontana Plan
The financial viability of NASCAR’s ambitious plan to transform the Fontana speedway into a short track is under scrutiny, with Dale Earnhardt Jr. raising considerable concerns.
As a keen businessman, Earnhardt Jr. identifies notable flaws in the proposal, primarily focusing on the financial hurdles. He highlights the complex regulatory landscape in California, emphasizing the arduous process of obtaining permits and adhering to building codes, which could inflate costs beyond the project’s value.
“Even if NASCAR wants to do it, they can’t get it done. This is something I don’t think a lot of people may consider — Think about the permits and challenges to build anything in the State of California, particularly around a sporting event or a speedway or anything like that. Not only the timeline and the hoops to jump through and get those permits and get that building code all sorted, but the expense and the cost. It’s going to cost more money to build the facility than it will be worth to have. I just don’t feel like it’s a financial success story.” – Dale Earnhardt Jr.
View this post on Instagram
Earnhardt Jr. questions whether the investment will yield a financial success story, given the exorbitant expenses associated with construction in Southern California.
Moreover, he points out the complications posed by ongoing construction on the remaining land, which could exacerbate logistical issues.
Although the Southern California market is traditionally favorable for motorsports, Earnhardt Jr. remains skeptical about the plan’s financial prudence. His insights call into question the project’s feasibility, urging NASCAR to reconsider its approach.
The Short-Track Racing Dream and NASCAR’s Dilemma
While the allure of short-track racing captures the imagination of motorsports enthusiasts, NASCAR faces a complex dilemma in realizing this dream at Fontana. The ambition to bring a Bristol or Martinsville-like experience to the West Coast is enticing, yet fraught with challenges.
“NASCAR can build it, it’s probably gonna cost more money than it’s worth to build, it’s probably going to be a bigger pain in the a– because of the permits and so forth that you’ll have to jump through to get it. Even if they badly wanted to build this short track, which I always felt like what the West Coast has always needed was a really good Saturday night short-track a– kicking. We go out there, we run road courses, we had the big Fontana track, we’ve done a lot of things out on the West Coast that are a lot of fun. One thing we haven’t taken to the West Coast market yet is Bristol or Martinsville. And I’ve walked out of those racetracks many times wishing we can bottle that up and take it all across the country because we’d be so successful if we could.”
“I think NASCAR does want to build that short track right there on that Fontana property, I just don’t think that they can do it. I don’t think that it’s worth it. I don’t think it’s realistic.” – Dale Earnhardt Jr.
- Financial Constraints: Building a short track at Fontana involves substantial costs, which may not be justified by the potential returns. The financial risk is considerable, and the investment could outweigh the benefits.
- Permitting Challenges: Maneuvering the bureaucratic landscape to secure necessary permits represents a formidable obstacle. The time and resources required could delay or derail the project.
- Market Viability: Despite a desire to replicate short-track success, there’s skepticism about whether it would resonate with the West Coast audience. The unique appeal of tracks like Bristol and Martinsville might not translate effectively.
The Reality of NASCAR’s Business Decision
Steering through the crossroads of tradition and business necessity, NASCAR’s decision to dismantle the Fontana track highlights a pragmatic approach dictated by financial realities.
The Auto Club Speedway, once a vibrant hub for NASCAR’s Cup Series, was sold for $569 million, transforming from a racetrack to a site for logistics and warehousing. This move emphasizes a shift from historic racing roots to lucrative land deals in Southern California, where rising property values overshadow the fervor of motorsport tradition.
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s concerns about the feasibility of reconfiguring Fontana into a short track resonate with NASCAR’s own hesitations.
Synergy with local lawmakers proved challenging, stalling the project’s progress. This decision aligns with a broader trend where iconic tracks, like those in Greenville and Midland, have ceded ground to commercial interests.
News in Brief: NASCAR’s Fontana Short Track Faces Brutal Reality
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s skepticism towards the Fontana short track plan reflects broader concerns about NASCAR’s tactical direction. While the dream of reviving short-track racing is appealing, the financial risks and logistical challenges cannot be ignored.
NASCAR faces a complex decision, balancing tradition with economic realities. As the sport grapples with evolving fan expectations and market dynamics, the Fontana project serves as a cautionary tale about investments that may not align with long-term sustainability goals.
ALSO READ: Dale Earnhardt Jr. Shares Unfiltered Stories in Earnhardt Documentary That NASCAR Fans Can’t Miss