Ricky Stenhouse Jr. praises the current superspeedway format for creating dynamic, side-by-side racing that enhances both the strategy and spectacle. However, Denny Hamlin has strong concerns, arguing that the sport’s focus on entertainment and reduced horsepower limits genuine racing skill. As NASCAR continues to evolve, this debate between excitement and competitive integrity intensifies, with both drivers offering compelling viewpoints on how the sport should move forward.
Key Highlights
- Ricky Stenhouse Jr. values dynamic side-by-side racing for enhancing driver opportunities and enriching the spectator experience.
- Denny Hamlin criticizes NASCAR for prioritizing entertainment and reducing horsepower, limiting genuine racing skill.
- Stenhouse Jr. believes current racing format offers varied tactics, balancing excitement and vehicle management.
- Hamlin argues that luck overshadows skill in major events like the Daytona 500 under the current format.
- Both drivers highlight the ongoing debate about NASCAR’s direction, focusing on balancing innovation with competitive integrity.
Setting the Stage for the Debate
The evolution of NASCAR superspeedway racing has sparked a lively debate among fans and drivers alike, as they grapple with the question of whether the sport has truly improved over the years.
Enthusiasts often reminisce about iconic moments, like the legendary Dale Earnhardt’s daring maneuvers, and yearn for the exhilarating spectacle of past short track races.
However, the sport’s landscape has undeniably transformed, with advancements in fuel strategies and aerodynamic packages.
This evolution prompts a critical examination: has it improved the quality of racing or diluted its core? Nostalgia tugs at the heartstrings, but innovation promises progress.
As the Jack Link’s 500 at Talladega Superspeedway approaches, this debate intensifies. Some purists argue for a return to simpler times, while others appreciate the tactical depth modern improvements bring.
Caught between reverence for history and anticipation of what lies ahead, the conversation remains vibrant and unresolved.
Ricky Stenhouse Jr.’s Perspective on Superspeedway Racing
In the midst of the ongoing debate over NASCAR’s evolution, Ricky Stenhouse Jr. provides a nuanced perspective on the dynamics of superspeedway racing. Acknowledging the role of luck in determining race outcomes, as exemplified by Austin Hill’s photo finish victory in the 2025 Xfinity Series Ag-Pro 300, Stenhouse Jr. welcomes the inherent unpredictability of the sport.
He contrasts past approaches where drivers would form single-file lines to save fuel with today’s more dynamic side-by-side and three-wide racing, which offers a more engaging spectacle for fans.
“When we were single wide around the top, you had a few guys that were impatient and wanted to go to the front, they could just drop down and really just drive to the front because we were all part-throttle around the top. So yeah, I don’t mind the side-by-side and three wide, it puts on a show. Then you always get the top lane that if they want to go to the front, they can, and they generally do. Then they will drop down and start saving fuel on the bottom and kind of stack the bottom line up. So, there are ways to get to the front, and I do find that nice.” – Ricky Stenhouse Jr.
Ricky Stenhouse Jr. just said something interesting: He more or less said the Superspeedway fuel-saving gridlock is an evolution of when the field used to ride in line around the top
Stemhouse says for the fans' sake the three-wide riding around at least puts on a good show. https://t.co/CEgewGN1Mq pic.twitter.com/2K3DadjXyS
— Steven Taranto (@STaranto92) April 26, 2025
Stenhouse Jr. appreciates the current format’s ability to create opportunities for drivers to advance, highlighting the tactical maneuvers involved when the top lane drives forward, then drops down to conserve fuel.
This approach, according to Stenhouse Jr., enriches the racing experience, offering varied tactics and maintaining the excitement that fans crave, while balancing the complexities of vehicle management on the racetrack.
Criticisms of the Current Superspeedway Format
While the current superspeedway format offers thrilling three-wide racing and dynamic fuel tactics, it has not escaped criticism from drivers and spotters alike. Derek Kneeland, a prominent spotter, has expressed frustration with the Gen 7 car and its fuel-saving demands. He believes these tactical differences hinder competitive racing.
In the 2024 Talladega race, Kyle Busch was adversely affected by these very tactics, as Kneeland’s call to switch lanes resulted in a loss of position due to divergent fuel strategies among competitors.
“I might as well just retire from Cup spotting at restrictor plate races and just stick to the Trucks and Xfinity stuff because I don’t know when we can race. I don’t know when we need to ride. I don’t. It just f—— sucks.” – Derek Kneeland
Critics argue that, despite more chaotic racing, the new format merely reshapes existing problems rather than resolving them. The debate continues on whether these changes improve the sport or complicate it further.
Denny Hamlin’s Criticism and Broader Concerns
In the midst of the ongoing debate over the superspeedway format, Denny Hamlin offers a particularly outspoken perspective on its current state. He criticizes the current direction of NASCAR, especially after the dramatic resolution of the Daytona 500.
Hamlin argues that the sport has prioritized entertainment over genuine racing skill, a sentiment he expressed on his podcast, “Actions Detrimental.” This critique is not isolated but reflects broader concerns shared by several stakeholders in NASCAR.
“I feel like the Daytona 500 is a microcosm of the sport in general as to how we crown our champion now as well. It started with the competition group a decade ago when we took away horsepower because we wanted to look good on TV. We wanted you to think they can pass, but not that they can actually pass. For me, it’s gotten to the place where the entertainment of it has far taken over the sport of it. And I don’t know how to reverse things.” – Denny Hamlin
- Horsepower Reduction: Hamlin believes the reduction in horsepower was intended to make races look appealing on TV, but it ultimately limits real passing opportunities.
- Role of Luck: He emphasizes that luck should not overshadow skill, especially in prestigious events like the Daytona 500.
- Tactical Limitations: The current format restricts drivers’ ability to make tactical moves, diminishing the sport’s competitive core.
- Call for Change: Hamlin suggests revisiting the superspeedway package to prioritize authentic racing.
News in Brief: NASCAR Superspeedway Debate
In the ongoing debate over NASCAR’s superspeedway racing, Ricky Stenhouse Jr. welcomes the chaos, viewing it as an integral and exhilarating aspect of the sport. Conversely, Denny Hamlin raises safety concerns, urging a reassessment of current practices. As NASCAR continues to evolve, this clash of perspectives highlights the challenge of balancing excitement with driver safety. Ultimately, the sport must navigate these contrasting viewpoints to guarantee a future that satisfies both its drivers and fans.
ALSO READ: Ricky Stenhouse Jr.’s Loyal Partner Signs Multi-Race Deal with HYAK Motorsports
