Last fall, Denny Hamlin made it clear that his team’s lawsuit against NASCAR wasn’t about stirring drama—it was about demanding fairness. As a co-owner of 23XI Racing alongside NBA legend Michael Jordan, Hamlin stepped into the legal arena with a goal: to push for meaningful reform in how the sport operates.
Their core issue lies with NASCAR’s charter system, which governs how teams qualify for races and how revenue is shared. Hamlin and Jordan see that structure as heavily slanted in NASCAR’s favor, limiting team independence and long-term stability. To challenge it, 23XI joined forces with Front Row Motorsports to launch an antitrust lawsuit, accusing NASCAR of maintaining monopoly-like control over media rights and financial distribution.
Behind the scenes, Jordan reportedly shared a motivational clip from Moneyball, referencing the idea that anyone pushing for change is bound to take the first hit. That mindset helped fuel their determination to go head-to-head with the sport’s governing body.
A Legal Strategy That Reaches Beyond NASCAR
As the lawsuit entered the discovery phase, the teams widened their scope. They requested financial information from top sports leagues including the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, INDYCAR, and Formula 1, hoping to use those models to draw comparisons and highlight NASCAR’s shortcomings. The teams wanted to show how other leagues support team sustainability through more equitable financial arrangements.
To do so, they issued subpoenas seeking documents from 2016 to 2024, including revenue breakdowns, team valuations, and internal financial policies. But their strategy hit a roadblock—particularly from a source they might not have expected: Formula 1’s parent company, Liberty Media.
Recently, Bob Pockrass of Fox Sports shared a key development in the case. “23XI/Front Row has dismissed court proceedings with Liberty Media (Formula 1) in trying to compel compliance with their subpoena for F1 financial info. Either the teams settled and got some info, or just dropped this quest. Other cases against INDYCAR, NFL, NHL, NBA continue,” he reported.
The decision to withdraw from the Liberty Media filing marks a significant shift. Whether the teams secured a private agreement or abandoned the pursuit remains unclear. What is evident is that this part of their evidence-gathering campaign has come to a quiet conclusion.
Widespread Pushback from Other Sports Leagues
23XI and Front Row had hoped to establish a “yardstick” to measure how fairly NASCAR treated its teams by using external models. But their effort was met with fierce resistance. The NFL was quick to respond, dismissing the subpoena by claiming the requested records were irrelevant to the case and not even available to its own clubs.
Other leagues shared the same stance. The NBA and NHL described the document demands as overly broad and intrusive. Liberty Media also refused to comply, suggesting the race teams could rely on public filings instead. In response, the teams clarified that they weren’t after sensitive formulas or trade secrets—just basic financial data across five categories, without any email searches or deep investigations.
Still, the refusals kept piling up. By early May, 23XI and Front Row decided to officially step away from the subpoena fight with Liberty Media. The loss of this financial comparison—especially with F1’s involvement—could weaken a key pillar of their case.
Yet, the lawsuit itself continues. Discovery remains open until June 30, with the trial scheduled to begin on December 1. Between now and then, both sides will argue over what evidence will be permitted in court.
NASCAR has also taken the offensive, filing a counterclaim demanding triple damages and asking that 23XI and Front Row lose their guaranteed starting spots in Cup Series races.
A Separate Courtroom Win for Front Row Motorsports
In the midst of the high-stakes legal dispute with NASCAR, Front Row Motorsports recently scored a separate but important legal victory. A federal appeals court ruled in their favor in a years-old lawsuit involving a 2016 charter deal with BK Racing.
Front Row had purchased a charter from BK Racing for $2 million under the condition it was free of debt. But a $9 million lien tied to the charter was later discovered, putting the deal in jeopardy. After years of legal battles, the court ruled that the original agreement was valid and ordered BK Racing’s former leadership to pay $2.1 million plus interest.
The win offers not just a financial cushion, but also a moral boost. It reinforces Front Row’s credibility in both the business and legal sides of the sport—something that could prove valuable as their larger case against NASCAR moves forward.
What Comes Next?
Even with the Formula 1 angle closed, 23XI and Front Row continue to fight. Their goal remains unchanged: to challenge NASCAR’s control over team finances and spark reform in how the sport is run. While their evidence base may be slimmer than hoped, they’re still pushing for what they see as a more balanced and transparent system.
For Hamlin and Jordan, this lawsuit isn’t just about their own team—it’s about the long-term health of NASCAR. Whether the courts agree remains to be seen.
ALSO READ: Denny Hamlin Blasts NASCAR and Demands Action After ‘Horrible Driving’ at Martinsville
