Key Highlights
- Denny Hamlin criticizes NASCAR’s playoff format for not adequately rewarding season-long consistency in performance.
- Hamlin suggests doubling regular season playoff points to emphasize sustained excellence over sporadic victories.
- He proposes reducing the playoff field to 12 competitors to ensure deserving participants advance.
- Hamlin highlights the issue of fluke victories impacting playoff entries and championship outcomes.
- He advocates for changes to better reflect true champions, emphasizing consistent performance throughout the season.
The Disappointment of the 2024 NASCAR Playoff Format
The 2024 NASCAR Playoff Format has become a source of consternation within the racing community, embodying a sense of frustration for its apparent inability to reward consistent performance.
Despite the anticipation surrounding the Daytona 500, the unchanged format casts a shadow over the season’s commencement. Joey Logano’s championship victory, with a lackluster average finish of 17.11, has intensified scrutiny of the system. This figure stands as the worst ever for a champion, igniting debates over the meritocracy of the playoff structure.
Critics argue that the format disproportionately favors sporadic victories rather than steady excellence. Denny Hamlin’s 2024 season exemplifies this disparity, boasting three wins and twelve top-5 finishes, yet ranking only 8th in total.
His superior average finish of 13.9, compared to championship contenders Logano and Blaney, highlights the perceived inequity. The current format, consequently, faces calls for reform to truly reflect consistent performance in crowning NASCAR’s champion.

The Issue with NASCAR’s Championship Format and Inconsistency
Why does the current NASCAR championship format seem to undermine the essence of competition? By prioritizing sporadic victories over season-long consistency, the format diminishes the value of regular-season performance. For instance, Christopher Bell and Kyle Larson, despite showcasing excellence with consistent finishes, were excluded from the final four contenders.
Joey Logano, conversely, secured the championship with a tactical focus on playoff races, amassing three of his four wins during this phase. This shift in focus raises questions about the integrity of the competitive spirit.
Detractors argue this system encourages mediocrity throughout the regular season, as evidenced by Hamlin’s critique of recent champions. The sport’s essence—consistent excellence—seems overshadowed by a format that rewards brief periods of superiority, thereby eroding the competitive foundation.
The 2023 and 2024 Seasons Highlight the Inconsistency Problem
Critics of NASCAR’s current playoff format point out a glaring inconsistency that has become increasingly apparent in the 2023 and 2024 seasons. The 2023 Cup title was secured by Ryan Blaney, whose average finish of 14.1 emphasized the disparity between playoff outcomes and season-long performance.
This discrepancy is exacerbated when compared to William Byron’s season-leading average of 11.0 and Chris Buescher’s 12.1, neither of whom clinched the championship. Such outcomes highlight a recurring issue with the playoff system’s inability to consistently reward season-long excellence.
- Blaney’s 2023 win with a 14.1 average finish
- Byron’s leading 11.0 average finish went unrewarded
- Buescher’s next-best 12.1 average finish, not in championship rivalry
- Joey Logano’s consistent 2022 win with a 13.5 average finish
- Inconsistencies detract from the legitimacy of the championship
This inconsistency problem raises questions about the efficacy of the current format in honoring true season-long skill.

Denny Hamlin’s Solution to the Inconsistency Problem
How can NASCAR address the growing dissatisfaction with its playoff format? Denny Hamlin proposes a solution that seeks to rectify the inconsistency plaguing the championship race.
By advocating for the doubling of playoff points accumulated during the regular season, Hamlin aims to reward sustained excellence over sporadic victories. This approach would enhance competitors demonstrating consistent performance, thereby reducing the likelihood of less deserving entries, such as those with singular, fluke victories, advancing to the playoffs.
“What I’m really fighting for in this is that make the regular season great again. In the sense of like make it matter because for the last three years, the regular season had no bearing. The champion did very unimpressive things during the regular season. So why would you tune in? If it’s proven three years in a row you don’t have to be good during the regular season. You can just get in you can just be average at best. That’s been the formula that’s won it just get hot the last couple of races and you’re fine. I don’t think that’s the right way to crown a champion in a sport where there’s so many variables.” – Denny Hamlin
Furthermore, Hamlin suggests narrowing the playoff field to 12, thereby excluding participants who, despite a singular race win, lack the overall season performance to merit their place among the elite.
“I think I would double the playoff points entering the playoffs. Well, I’m just saying I think all the points the playoff points that you acquire during the regular season should be doubled just simply because it will really reward those that have excellence throughout the entire season. I think if you lower the playoff field to 12 it would stop the 29th place car from making the playoffs because they won a race. Let’s just say maybe on fuel mileage… I’m trying not to say because you won a Superspeedway race. You know what I mean. I think that it really forces you to be on your game the entire season.” – Denny Hamlin
Such changes would mitigate the impact of anomalies, like Harrison Burton’s unexpected entry, which overshadowed consistent contenders like Bubba Wallace.
Hamlin emphasizes the necessity for final race consistency, ensuring that the champion truly reflects season-long superiority. These proposals warrant consideration for fostering a more deserving NASCAR champion.
Potential Future Changes to the NASCAR Playoff Format in 2026
Although NASCAR’s current playoff format has been a staple of the sport, it has drawn criticism for its perceived lack of equity and consistency, prompting discussions about potential revisions for 2026. Critics argue that the format’s emphasis on singular victories over consistent performance can result in undeserving champions.
“They (NASCAR) rather just if they’re going to do something make a real change and then make it when they have more time or input. Obviously, their offseason probably was really filled with trying to deal with all these other rule changes. I mean when they came out with this plethora of rule changes on this one specific day, I mean they didn’t just dream up that week, right? They’ve been working on this for some time, more than likely you know they want to spend this season really diving into what do we change for the 2026 playoffs. And I am confident they will change something for the 2026 playoffs.” – Denny Hamlin
Denny Hamlin suggests implementing a championship round composed of multiple races at top tracks to mitigate this issue.
- Multiple-Race Championship Round: Introduce a three-race finale at prominent tracks like Homestead Miami, Martinsville, or Phoenix.
- Points Reset: Reset points before the championship round, allowing the best performer across these races to claim the title.
- Elimination Format Retention: Maintain the elimination structure to preserve competition intensity.
- Rule Revisions: Consider changes to playoff waivers and provisional entries to guarantee fairness.
- Addressing Manipulation: Implement penalties for race manipulation to uphold competition integrity.
![]()
News in Brief: Denny Hamlin Questions NASCAR’s Title Formula
The 2024 NASCAR playoff format continues to spark frustration, highlighting the inconsistency in crowning a champion. Critics, including Denny Hamlin, argue that the current system prioritizes drama over consistent performance, undermining the integrity of the championship.
The frequent fluctuations in standings, often due to the elimination-style format, fail to reward season-long excellence. As discussions for the 2026 changes loom, NASCAR faces demands to adopt a more equitable system that truly reflects the skill and persistence of its drivers.
ALSO READ: Denny Hamlin Warns of ‘Kink’ in NASCAR Rule That Could Tip the Scales for Some Drivers

