Key Highlights
- Both van Gisbergen and Allmendinger excel on road courses but face challenges on ovals critical for playoff success.
- Tire management and adaptability are strengths for van Gisbergen, similar to Allmendinger’s strategic advantages.
- Restart struggles and positioning issues hinder van Gisbergen’s playoff potential, akin to Allmendinger’s past challenges.
- The competitive edge on road courses diminishes as rival teams adapt to their strategies, impacting both drivers’ playoff chances.
- Limited road course events highlight the narrow margin for error in securing playoff positions for both drivers.
Shane van Gisbergen’s Dominance on Road Courses
Although Shane van Gisbergen‘s move to NASCAR was met with skepticism, his expertise on road courses quickly silenced many critics, emphasizing his adaptability and talent. His victory at the 2023 Chicago Street Race, under challenging weather conditions, exemplified his skill and resilience.
This success was not an isolated incident; his performance at Watkins Glen, where he secured a commendable runner-up finish, further cemented his reputation as a formidable road course competitor. Van Gisbergen’s adept handling of NASCAR vehicles on these demanding tracks highlights his mastery of the sport’s intricacies.
The Kiwi driver’s seamless shift from other racing disciplines to NASCAR demonstrates his expansive skill set and innate racing intelligence. His tactical approach to each race, coupled with his ability to adapt quickly to different track conditions, sets him apart.
While his road course successes are notable, they also emphasize the challenges he faces in broader NASCAR competition.

NASCAR Insiders Discuss SVG’s Playoff Chances
Shane van Gisbergen’s potential to make the NASCAR Playoffs has become a hot topic among insiders, with his road course skill offering both promise and caution.
On the Teardown podcast, experts Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi evaluated the V8 Supercars alumnus’s prospects. Gluck noted van Gisbergen’s superior tire management, a vital factor in his favored status.
However, Bianchi highlighted his struggles with restarts, a recurring issue that could jeopardize playoff hopes. The consensus is that his road course expertise might secure a win in one of the five remaining regular-season events, but this assumption carries inherent risks.
“That was all day. He struggled all day on restarts. Just could not get his car to go. This is a point we’re talking about. We both picked SVG to make the Playoffs, based off his road course prowess. He’s going to win one of these 5 regular season road course races. Today’s a perfect example. It’s almost fool’s gold. We did this with AJ Allmendinger a few years ago. You just don’t know, you can be as great as he is on road courses. Start off great, dominate Stage 1, and look like you’re going to control this race. Your car fades, other guys get better, get a bad set of tires, the car doesn’t restart. All of these things are going on.” – Jordan Bianchi
- Tire Management: SVG’s ability to maintain tire quality sets him apart.
- Restart Struggles: Persistent restart issues could undermine his performance.
- Road Course Potential: High expectations due to road course skill.
- Playoff Prediction: Insiders cautiously optimistic about SVG’s playoff chances.
SVG’s Struggles During the Race
The race presented considerable challenges for Shane van Gisbergen, as he grappled with persistent restart difficulties, a recurring theme in his NASCAR adventure. Despite having fresher tires, van Gisbergen expressed dissatisfaction with his final set, complicating his performance. His position in the middle pack further exacerbated his struggles, causing temporary setbacks.
Nevertheless, the Kiwi driver displayed resilience, navigating back to the 6th position before succumbing to another restart challenge, a moment that defined his race’s outcome.
In the competitive environment, van Gisbergen found it arduous to match the pace of seasoned drivers like Bell and Busch, emphasizing an area for growth.

Kyle Petty Weighs in on SVG’s Declining Edge
In an era where data transparency reigns supreme, Kyle Petty’s observations highlight an essential shift in Shane van Gisbergen’s competitive standing within NASCAR. Petty noted that van Gisbergen’s once-dominant edge on road courses seems to be diminishing.
The legendary driver’s insight reveals that the open-book nature of racing data has allowed rival teams to dissect van Gisbergen’s strategies. This transparency erodes the advantage van Gisbergen brought from Supercars.
“We live in a time when data is an open book… Every team out there can look at his data.” – Kyle Petty
Is Shane Van Gisbergen Losing His Edge in NASCAR?
#NASCAR pic.twitter.com/m2vyps5rCy— PRN (@PRNlive) March 3, 2025
Petty’s analysis emphasizes several significant points:
- The adaptation of other teams to van Gisbergen’s techniques is accelerating.
- The stress mounts for van Gisbergen with only four regular-season road courses remaining.
- The Circuit of The Americas marked a missed opportunity for leveraging his road course skill.
- An urgent need exists to either excel on upcoming road courses or adapt to oval tracks.
Lessons from Watkins Glen and the Harsh Reality of NASCAR
While the allure of road course racing often raises certain drivers, the harsh realities of NASCAR’s competitive landscape were vividly depicted at Watkins Glen in 2024.
Shane van Gisbergen, renowned for his road course expertise, found himself on the brink of victory, only to be thwarted by an unforced error. This slip allowed Chris Buescher, positioned tactically in second place, to seize the lead and ultimately prevail. Such incidents highlight the unforgiving nature of NASCAR, where precision and resilience are paramount.
Jordan Bianchi’s analysis emphasizes the narrow margin for error, particularly for road course specialists like van Gisbergen, who face limited opportunities—merely five road course events—to secure a playoff position.
“Go back to Watkins Glen last year. He was great, but he made a mistake. Buescher forced him into a mistake and he fumbled. That happens, but that just shows you how hard it is to win races. For these guys, they don’t have a 1 in 26 shot, they only have a 1 in 5 shot.” – Jordan Bianchi
This contrasts sharply with drivers who consistently vie for regular-season points across diverse tracks. Ultimately, Watkins Glen serves as a poignant reminder of the intense competition and the intricate skill required to succeed in the NASCAR arena.

News in Brief: AJ Allmendinger’s Past Haunts Shane van Gisbergen
In evaluating Shane van Gisbergen’s performance, experts highlight his skill on road courses, yet acknowledge the challenges he faces in NASCAR’s competitive landscape. Despite early dominance, SVG’s struggles in maintaining a competitive edge, as noted by Kyle Petty, emphasize the harsh realities of NASCAR playoff racing.
His experiences at Watkins Glen serve as a vivid reminder of NASCAR’s demanding nature, emphasizing the necessity for adaptability and resilience to succeed consistently in this high-stakes environment.
ALSO READ: Shane Van Gisbergen’s Star Power Fading Fast? NASCAR Analysts Challenge His Road Course Hype

