Danica Patrick, well-known for her achievements in auto racing and outspoken presence on social media, has publicly backed Florida’s recent move to outlaw weather modification methods, sharing her support just days after covering the Formula 1 Grand Prix in Montreal. On Wednesday, after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced plans to sign legislation banning techniques like cloud seeding, Patrick expressed her endorsement with the words, “First of 50—let’s go,” on her Instagram Story, calling for other states to follow Florida’s example.
This new Florida bill aims to make it a third-degree felony to inject or disperse chemicals or devices into the atmosphere with the intention of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight. Under the law, those found breaking these rules could face up to five years in prison. Governor DeSantis emphasized the reasoning behind the legislation, stating,
“People got a lot of kooky ideas that they can get in and put things in the atmosphere to block the sun and save us from climate change. We’re not playing that game in Florida.”
The response across social media has been energetic since Danica Patrick gave her endorsement, with many commenters echoing similar sentiments. “This should be nationwide,” wrote one user, while another added,
“FINALLY!!! Maybe we can see the stars and blue sky again.”
These reactions reflect a growing conversation about the reach and influence of weather modification practices and government regulation.
Danica Patrick’s support for the ban comes at a time when she has been very open about her political views, including her support for Donald Trump as the 2024 presidential election approaches. Recently, she covered the Miami Grand Prix for Sky Sports and attended Trump’s inauguration in January, emphasizing her active involvement in both sports and public discourse.
The implications of Florida’s weather modification ban could be significant, both statewide and potentially across the nation, if other states consider similar measures. While it remains to be seen whether this action will start a broader movement, Danica Patrick’s endorsement has certainly sparked a lively debate, raising critical questions about climate intervention, personal freedom, and the role of science in public policy. The coming weeks may reveal whether more leaders—and perhaps more states—will answer the call for stricter regulation on weather modification.
