A heated conversation over the NASCAR playoff format has erupted, as the Denny Hamlin playoff format debate intensifies following strong criticism from Hamlin and endorsement from racing legend Mark Martin. The discussion centers around whether the current “win and you’re in” system, which allows drivers a playoff spot with a single victory, serves the integrity of NASCAR or simply adds drama.
Momentum for this debate began when Dirty Mo Media released a segment from The Teardown podcast, where NASCAR insider Jordan Bianchi vocalized support for the “win and you’re in” approach. Bianchi argued on the podcast that this format injects excitement and encourages bold moves, making each race count for more. His view suggested the format creates memorable narratives and helps keep the sport engaging, pointing to recent performances by drivers such as Ryan Preece and Brad Keselowski as examples.
Mark Martin Steps Forward in Hamlin’s Defense
Jeff Gluck, a respected NASCAR journalist and podcast host, shared the podcast clip on social media, sparking widespread discussion among fans and experts alike. In the clip, Bianchi expressed,
Today again showed me why whatever playoff format you go to, I do not want to lose the win and you’re in aspect of this sport.
The sentiment continued as Bianchi elaborated,
I think it’s good, I think it heightens the stakes, I think it makes things more exciting, it adds another story, and today is a perfect example. Not only with Ryan Preece, but also Brad Keselowski. Brad Keselowski today, if he would have won, or if you can win one of the next three races, saving his season, that’s a big story, and the sport is better for that, and you will not convince me otherwise,
—Jordan Bianchi, NASCAR Insider
Gluck invited his followers to weigh in on the matter, drawing rapid responses. Denny Hamlin did not hold back, responding directly with his clear stance against Bianchi’s viewpoint. Hamlin stated,
He’s picking entertainment from casuals’ perspective over the sport’s integrity and our core fan base. Numbers don’t lie.
—Denny Hamlin, NASCAR Driver
This counterpoint from Hamlin reenergized ongoing discussions throughout the NASCAR community about whether the playoff structure prioritizes spectacle at the expense of tradition and consistent performance. Drivers, including Brad Keselowski and Ryan Preece, often find themselves in make-or-break scenarios thanks to the current system, amplifying both the spectacle and unpredictability of the sport.
Debate Resurfaces Concerns About NASCAR’s Direction
The playoff format’s transformation from a season-long cumulative points battle to today’s elimination bracket has drawn criticism from both seasoned drivers and long-term fans. Many argue that randomness now plays a bigger role, undermining the consistency that once defined multi-race championship contention. Mark Martin’s support for Hamlin’s argument is particularly notable. Martin, known for his steady excellence during his career, is a prominent voice who never managed to clinch a championship, despite the old format giving greater weight to consistency.
NASCAR continues to navigate feedback from figures like Denny Hamlin, Mark Martin, and other current or veteran drivers on whether its current path best serves dedicated followers or risks alienating fans who value the sport’s roots. As debates rage over race wins, playoff structures, and the stories they produce, the issue remains unresolved, pushing the conversation about the future direction of the sport even further into the spotlight.
