Danica Patrick has ignited a storm with her critical remarks about the NFL’s selection of Bad Bunny for the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show, thrusting the Danica Patrick Super Bowl controversy into the spotlight. The outcry began when Patrick, a former IndyCar and NASCAR driver, publicly challenged the league’s decision to feature the popular Puerto Rican performer at one of America‘s most anticipated TV events.
Patrick’s Social Media Reaction Draws Fire
Patrick took to X (formerly Twitter) to react to Bad Bunny, born Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, being tapped for the Super Bowl stage. Responding sarcastically to another user’s announcement, she wrote, “Oh fun.” But her subsequent comment provoked a far stronger response across social media:
“No songs in English should not be allowed at one of America’s highest-rated television events of the year … not just for sports.”
– Danica Patrick, Former IndyCar and NASCAR Driver
Patrick’s remarks immediately faced backlash, with critics accusing her of fostering exclusionary attitudes. Bad Bunny, known for his predominantly Spanish-language Latin trap and reggaeton tracks, has enjoyed global success, topping charts and performing to sold-out crowds worldwide. But as the NFL moves to amplify diversity and global reach, debates about language and representation have grown more intense.
Political Undercurrents Fuel Debate
Extending her critique, Patrick shared a contentious assertion branding Bad Bunny a “demonic Marxist” and questioning his suitability for the Super Bowl spotlight. This post intensified the political implications of her comments, which are consistent with her recent public stances. In 2024, Patrick voiced her support for former President Donald Trump during his return campaign, despite admitting she had not previously voted, underlining her growing involvement in polarized political discourse.
The controversy over entertainment at major events like the Super Bowl is hardly new, yet Patrick’s comments arrive amidst ongoing cultural arguments about what constitutes authentic “American” entertainment. Recent halftime shows have featured figures such as Jennifer Lopez, Shakira, and The Weeknd, reflecting the NFL’s ongoing embrace of diverse artists and musical styles.
Bad Bunny’s Perspective and the NFL’s Response
Bad Bunny’s rise to Super Bowl prominence is shaped by both acclaim and scrutiny. He has openly expressed concerns regarding his performances in the United States, citing the risks faced by immigrants and his own fears:
“But there was the issue of, like, fing ICE could be outside [my concerts],”
– Bad Bunny, Music Artist to i-D Magazine
“And it’s something that we were talking about and very concerned about.”
– Bad Bunny, Music Artist to i-D Magazine
Despite the backlash provoked by Patrick and others, NFL executives have stood firm in their selection. Jon Barker, a league representative, issued a statement in support of the decision:
“Bad Bunny represents the global energy and cultural vibrancy that define today’s music scene,”
– Jon Barker, NFL Executive
“As one of the most influential and streamed artists in the world, his unique ability to bridge genres, languages, and audiences makes him an exciting and natural choice to take the Super Bowl halftime stage.”
– Jon Barker, NFL Executive
The league reportedly considered other major artists, including Taylor Swift, for the slot, though talks fell through before finalizing Bad Bunny as headliner.
Cultural Implications and Ongoing Debate
The significance of Bad Bunny’s halftime performance extends beyond entertainment, symbolizing cultural pride and representation for many. After the announcement, he remarked:
“This is for my people, my culture, and our history,”
– Bad Bunny, Music Artist
As discussions continue to swirl online around language, inclusion, identity, and what qualifies as “American” at such a public event, the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show promises to remain a lightning rod for both celebration and controversy, long before players take the field.
