Danica Patrick, former motorsport star and current racing commentator, is experiencing significant backlash after questioning Bad Bunny’s placement as lead performer for the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show, suggesting the event should feature an English-speaking artist. This comment has ignited a strong response from fans and followers on social media, highlighting the ongoing conversation about representation at major entertainment events—a discussion now closely associated with the phrase Danica Patrick Super Bowl backlash.
Patrick’s Transition from Racing to Commentary
Patrick, whose career spans both IndyCar and NASCAR, is widely regarded within the motorsports world. After retiring from professional racing, she shifted her focus to broadcasting, joining panels such as those on Sky Sports for North American motorsport events. She has developed a reputation for offering candid and sometimes controversial opinions during broadcasts and online commentary.
Her recent remarks about Bad Bunny, the Puerto Rican artist selected for the upcoming Super Bowl halftime show, are one example of this outspoken approach. Her comments quickly drew criticism from various corners, with many accusing her of lacking sensitivity to the diverse nature of large-scale American entertainment events.
Social Media Reactions Intensify Backlash
The response on social media was swift and pointed, as users voiced their disagreement with Patrick’s perspective. Some questioned how her own career choices relate to her argument, while others doubted her standing to comment on such matters. Among the array of responses:
“Someone who’s allowed a huge platform in f1 whenever they touch American soil btw.”
– Fan on social media
“Who is Danica Patrick? I don’t know who that is??”
– Fan on social media
“If Bad Bunny doesn’t belong at the halftime show then she didn’t belong in NASCAR, if she wants to play that “traditional American values” card,” – Fan on social media
“No one cares what she thinks smh 🙄. Bad Bunny is going to be legit!”
– Netizen on social media
“So driving around in circles as a career makes your opinion important or am I missing something?”
– Netizen on social media
“Ugh Danica,” – Netizen on social media
This online reaction, fueled by both long-time fans and new voices, demonstrates the passionate debate within the motorsport and entertainment communities about cultural representation and the role of public figures in these discussions.
Patrick’s Wider Presence in Sports Discussions
Beyond the Super Bowl controversy, Patrick continues to participate in conversations within the racing world. The F1 community, for example, has recently been following Lewis Hamilton’s personal loss—the passing of his long-time companion, the bulldog Roscoe. Hamilton adopted Roscoe in 2013, and the dog had accompanied him through six drivers’ championship victories, even as Hamilton transitioned to Ferrari.
Following Roscoe’s death, Patrick, who is herself a dog owner, expressed condolences on Hamilton’s social media:
“I’m so sorry. 💔 Dogs have such a special place in our lives. Losing one is one of the hardest experiences. Praying for your heart and Roscoe’s peace in heaven over the rainbow bridge.”
– Danica Patrick, dog parent and commentator
Hamilton is expected to return to racing during the Singapore Grand Prix, where honoring Roscoe may provide extra motivation for a strong result.
Implications and Ongoing Impact
The reaction to Patrick’s comments reflects an intense emotional current within both her personal fanbase and the broader sporting audience. The episode highlights challenges faced by public figures when expressing opinions on culturally significant topics, particularly when those statements intersect with issues of representation and national identity. As the Super Bowl approaches and discussions about its halftime performers continue, the situation serves as a reminder of the scrutiny that can accompany outspoken commentary in the age of social media.
Who is Danica Patrick? I don’t know who that is?? pic.twitter.com/MY7ZaS4eFp
— 🌻 (@goddessmoon01) October 2, 2025
If Bad Bunny doesn’t belong at the halftime show then she didn’t belong in NASCAR, if she wants to play that “traditional American values” card
— Pittsburgh Bron (@pittsburghBRON) October 2, 2025
No one cares what she thinks smh 🙄.
Bad Bunny is going to be legit!
— guyfelicella🇨🇦🍁 (@guyfelicella) October 3, 2025
So driving around in circles as a career makes your opinion important or am I missing something?
— 💁♀️.sol | cryptokaren.sol (@cryptokaren_sol) October 2, 2025
Ugh Danica
— 🔮 CULTURAL WEATHER VANE 🔮 (@tallyohhh) October 2, 2025
