In the aftermath of the 2024 Daytona 500, a late-race crash involving Riley Herbst and Brad Keselowski sparked significant debate about culpability and strategy, with Dale Earnhardt Jr. publically defending Herbst’s actions. The Brad Keselowski Daytona 500 controversy became the talk of the garage, even as Tyler Reddick celebrated his victory.
Controversial Collision on the Final Lap
The closing moments of the Daytona 500 saw tense, chaotic racing as drivers scrambled for position. With victory in sight, Riley Herbst made a last-ditch attempt to go three-wide for a possible win. Instead, contact between Herbst and Keselowski caused a crash just 100 yards from the finish line, relegating Keselowski’s hopes and stirring raw emotions. Keselowski did not mince words after the race, describing Herbst’s move as
one of the dumbest things I have ever seen,
—Brad Keselowski, driver of the No. 6 Ford. Keselowski’s frustration was fueled by his belief that Herbst, driving the No. 35 Toyota, had little hope of successfully blocking his momentum and forced the issue unnecessarily.
Earnhardt Jr.’s Perspective on the Incident
Speaking on his podcast, Dale Earnhardt Jr. provided a starkly different analysis of the Brad Keselowski Daytona 500 controversy. He challenged the view that Herbst acted recklessly, emphasizing that the situation was more complicated, with fast-changing lanes and intense pressure on all drivers. Earnhardt noted,
At the end of the race, there was this interesting sort of debate around Riley Herbst and Brad Keselowski,
—Dale Earnhardt Jr., broadcaster and former NASCAR driver. He pointed out that

“Brad was upset, thinking Riley wrecked the field for no reason.”
Looking at the replay, Earnhardt observed,
… That wreck looked like the rest of the wrecks to me. Riley didn’t come up the track in front of him. He drove into him.
—Dale Earnhardt Jr., broadcaster and former NASCAR driver. He attributed the incident to Herbst misjudging how quickly Keselowski was closing rather than deliberate aggression.
The Role of Awareness and Superspeedway Chaos
Earnhardt further discussed how situational awareness, not intention, shaped the outcome. During the messy final mile, drivers kept track of multiple lanes and shifting momentum, and Earnhardt suggested that Herbst may not have seen Keselowski closing in from behind. He shared,
Is it a lack of awareness? I thought it was more like, he’s looking at what’s happening out in front of him. … He just didn’t have all the corners of the car covered,
—Dale Earnhardt Jr., broadcaster and former NASCAR driver, adding,
It wasn’t so much like, ‘Hey, I’m going to wreck these guys.’ It was more like, ‘Hey, I’m pulling up into an area where there’s a car, and I didn’t know he was there.’
—Dale Earnhardt Jr.
Herbst himself echoed a similar view post-race, admitting he tried to make a late, desperate move for the win, but the failed attempt triggered a multi-car wreck. The crash ended with Reddick avoiding the chaos to secure first place, while Keselowski finished fifth and Herbst recorded a personal-best eighth.
Lingering Debate and Industry Impact
The events have left the racing community divided, with some viewing Herbst’s move as calculated risk and others dismissing it as an unfortunate byproduct of superspeedway racing. For Earnhardt, the event fit the pattern of Daytona’s unpredictable drama and was more a matter of circumstance than willful damage. He concluded,
Riley catches a lot of shit, but I’m not gonna get on his ass about this one,
—Dale Earnhardt Jr., broadcaster and former NASCAR driver.
The intensity around the Brad Keselowski Daytona 500 controversy illustrates how razor-thin decisions can define careers, legacies, and emotions at racing’s biggest stage. At Daytona, a split-second choice can live on far past the checkered flag, keeping tensions high in the garage and among fans over what might have been if circumstances had played out differently.