Kevin Harvick calls out NASCAR’s DVP disaster and sparks a debate in the racing world. For years, the Damaged Vehicle Policy (DVP) has frustrated drivers with unclear rules and inconsistent penalties. Some teams lost races over minor issues, while others stayed on track despite major wrecks. Now, a big change is here. Harvick has spoken, but is this the fix the sport needs? The racing community is watching closely as the new policy takes effect.
Key Highlights
- Kevin Harvick criticized NASCAR’s DVP for inconsistent enforcement and called it a “sh–show.”
- Harvick praised the new DVP rule changes, which allow more team autonomy and fairer competition.
- The revised policy permits damaged cars to compete if repaired within seven minutes, alleviating previous controversies.
- The new rules remove the seven-minute timer, giving teams more control over vehicle safety management.
- Harvick believes the changes enhance the racing experience and address previous DVP criticisms.
Criticism of the Damaged Vehicle Policy (DVP)
The controversy surrounding NASCAR’s Damaged Vehicle Policy (DVP) has been a notable point of disagreement in recent years. Fans and drivers have expressed dissatisfaction, particularly after incidents involving Ryan Blaney and Josh Berry, who faced elimination due to minor damages such as flat tires.
These occurrences sparked criticism over the policy’s inconsistent application, which seemed to unfairly penalize competitors for trivial issues. NASCAR officials found themselves under scrutiny, as their decisions appeared arbitrary, leading to widespread discontent among the racing community.
Criticism peaked when veteran driver Kevin Harvick labeled the policy a “sh–show” following a contentious crash at Talladega. His pointed remarks resonated with the sentiments of many, highlighting a growing demand for reform. In response, NASCAR acknowledged the valid concerns, initiating revisions to the DVP.
Scrutiny of the 2024 Cup Series DVP Policy
Amid ongoing debates over NASCAR’s Damaged Vehicle Policy (DVP), the 2024 Cup Series has come under intense scrutiny, particularly regarding allegations of inconsistent enforcement.
Significantly, the disqualification of Josh Berry at Kansas Speedway sparked controversy. He was penalized for a minor collision, prompting questions about the DVP’s application.
In clear contrast, during the YellaWood 500 at Talladega, Chase Elliott and Chase Briscoe were involved in a massive 28-car wreck yet were not eliminated, despite their inability to return to pit road. This inconsistency in enforcement led to accusations of double standards, with critics questioning why playoff cars received different treatment than others.
Kevin Harvick says that the new DVP policy takes NASCAR out of some of the decision-making when it comes to whether a car is out of the race or whether it can be worked on, and that's a good thing. @NASCARONFOX pic.twitter.com/KRKS2QBKZK
— Bob Pockrass (@bobpockrass) February 12, 2025
Kevin Harvick, a respected voice in the sport, highlighted the necessity of removing bureaucratic complexities from the DVP’s execution. His comments emphasized a widespread sentiment for clearer, more equitable guidelines. The events of 2024 have propelled NASCAR to reconsider its approach, aiming for a definitive resolution in 2025.
“I think after the fiasco that they had last year with all the DVP policies and questionable tow back to the garage for flat tires and different things like that, I think, anytime that you can take the bureaucracy out of the situation,…it really allows NASCAR to not be involved in what’s going on.” – (Harvick)
New DVP Rule Changes and the Impact on NASCAR
In an effort to streamline operations and reduce controversies, NASCAR has introduced notable changes to the Damaged Vehicle Policy for the 2024 Cup Series. The revised policy allows damaged race cars to continue competing, provided repairs are completed within a seven-minute timeframe on pit road.
Should repairs exceed this limit, vehicles are permitted to proceed to the garage for further work. This shift grants teams greater autonomy in managing their vehicles’ return to the track, minimizing NASCAR’s intervention in critical race decisions.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Repair Time Limit | Seven minutes on pit road |
| Post-Limit Action | Vehicles move to garage for more repairs |
| Flat Tire Procedure | Cars towed to pit area |
| Team Autonomy | Increased control over race decisions |
This policy evolution addresses previous criticisms by reducing NASCAR’s direct involvement in contentious scenarios. Kevin Harvick acknowledges the effectiveness of this approach, suggesting it alleviates the strain on NASCAR while enhancing the comprehensive sporting experience.
“Anytime that NASCAR can take themselves out of it, I think it’s better because of the fact that they’re in a no win situation. The fans are gonna criticize them. The teams are gonna criticize them whether it was a good decision or a bad decision. So anytime that they can remove themselves from that type of situation, I think it’s better for not only them, but for the for the whole sport.” – (Harvick)
Driver and Team Reactions to the New DVP Changes
How has the NASCAR community responded to the recent changes in the Damaged Vehicle Policy? The response has been particularly positive, with many drivers and teams appreciating the new rule.
Kevin Harvick, a prominent driver, has been vocal in his support, highlighting the benefits of allowing teams to determine vehicle safety. This approach, he argues, improves the well-being of team members and drivers.
Operating the Next Gen car is inherently stressful, and the new policy alleviates some of this burden by eliminating accusations of favoritism.
“Let the teams decide if the car can go back out on the racetrack. Let the stopwatch decide if it’s fast enough, from a minimum speed standpoint. But with the way that the tires go flat and the way that things happen with this particular car, I think taking them out of the decision of whether it can go back on track and having a limit or where to tow it, I think it’s a great decision.” – (Harvick)
Industry veterans and journalists, like Jordan Bianchi and Jeff Gluck, have also praised the changes, acknowledging them as logical and straightforward. Discussions on the Teardown Podcast revealed insights from crew chiefs who favor the reduced necessity of bringing crash cars.
“This feels much more straightforward… I’ve kind of exchanged a lot of messages with crew chiefs the last few days…um, teams kinda like that they didn’t have to bring crash cards as much.” – (nascar insiders)
Reactions from Other Drivers and Teams on the DVP Changes
The recent changes to NASCAR’s Damaged Vehicle Policy (DVP) have sparked a range of reactions from drivers and teams, reflecting a shift in how vehicle safety is managed.
Ryan Blaney, who experienced a controversial incident at Watkins Glen last year when his No. 12 Ford was prematurely ruled out due to a broken steering column, expressed support for the revisions. He highlighted the previous policy’s propensity to generate disputes, emphasizing his appreciation for the new approach that delegates more control to crew chiefs and teams.
“Yes, I like that a lot. I am a big supporter of that. I don’t know why it got to where it was with the DVP because it just created controversy. A good example is the Glen last year in the playoffs. I got tore up, but I didn’t even get tore up on lap one. I just broke a little, like the steering column.” – (Blaney)
The alterations, particularly the removal of the seven-minute timer, have been welcomed by drivers who see it as a step towards fairer competition.
Teams now have increased authority to decide whether a damaged car can safely continue racing, reducing the sanctions’ direct interventions. This policy change not only addresses past controversies but also empowers teams to make tactical decisions, enhancing their engagement and responsibility during races.
News in Brief: Kevin Harvick Calls Out NASCAR’s DVP Disaster
The recent changes to NASCAR’s Damaged Vehicle Policy have sparked notable discussion within the racing community. Kevin Harvick’s criticism highlights ongoing concerns, yet the new rules aim to reduce controversies and improve race integrity.
Drivers and teams have expressed a variety of reactions, with some praising the efforts to elevate competitive fairness. As NASCAR navigates these adjustments, the organization remains focused on balancing safety with the dynamic demands of competitive racing, ensuring a more equitable experience for all participants.
ALSO READ: Kevin Harvick Responds to Chase Elliott Fans’ Sneaky Insults After Bristol Showdown
