Denny Hamlin leads 23XI Racing charter battle against NASCAR as tensions reach a breaking point, with the team launching an urgent legal appeal after the U.S. Court of Appeals sided against them. Just days after an unfavorable ruling that threatens their guaranteed race starts and millions in purse revenue, Hamlin and co-owner Michael Jordan are doubling down on challenging NASCAR’s controversial charter system in hopes of reshaping the sport’s power structure.
Hamlin, Jordan, and 23XI’s High-Stakes Legal Stand
The stakes could hardly be higher for 23XI Racing. After the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against their claims—placing the team’s charter status and, by extension, its future in jeopardy—Denny Hamlin refused to back away. Facing the possibility of competing as an uncharted, “open” team, Hamlin and Michael Jordan stood defiant. Forced into open status, they would lose guaranteed entries in NASCAR’s Cup Series races and see a drastic reduction in revenue. Still, Hamlin maintained his commitment:
“We’re committed to running this season open if we have to. We’re going to race and fulfill all of our commitments no matter what,”
—Denny Hamlin, Team Co-owner
The road to this moment was paved with tension and unease. The franchise model, or charter system, is deeply embedded in NASCAR’s financial and competitive structure. Without a charter, teams like 23XI risk financial freefall. As a new powerhouse co-owned by Hamlin and global sports icon Michael Jordan, 23XI was built for long-term competition—but this ruling left their future uncertain.

Rather than accept the judgment, 23XI Racing, joined by Front Row Motorsports, responded with determination. In the final hours before deadline, they filed a bold petition for a rehearing by the full panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The teams argued that the issue is of “exceptional importance” and that the initial verdict misunderstood crucial antitrust matters. Their legal argument contended that NASCAR’s charter policy forces teams to sign away their right to challenge unfair practices, which they believe preserves NASCAR’s monopoly at the expense of fair competition.
The petition stated:
“The monopolist here, NASCAR, requires premier stock-car-racing teams to sign a release of antitrust claims as a condition of racing with a charter. Racing with a charter is… the only economically viable way to race,”
—Legal Filing, 23XI Racing & FRM
By seeking a review by the entire bench, 23XI and FRM are challenging how the court interpreted the combination of NASCAR’s contractual restrictions, including limits on where and how teams race, non-competitive clauses, and acquisitions of rival organizations. The legal team’s argument is that these actions, taken in totality, create an unfair competitive landscape. They insist that the panel’s decision overlooked how these actions reinforce one another to keep teams locked into an anti-competitive system:
“The panel’s opinion addressed just one anticompetitive act in isolation… rather than considering whether the Release is anticompetitive when combined with NASCAR’s other anticompetitive acts.”
—Legal Filing, 23XI Racing & FRM
Failure to overturn the charter system poses a near-existential threat to independent teams. The financial analysis presented by 23XI and FRM underscores that losing a charter could cut off tens of millions in revenue, a loss big enough to cripple their operations and undermine years of investment in Cup Series competition.
Legal Appeals Put NASCAR’s System Under the Microscope
Not long after receiving the renewed request for a hearing, the U.S. Court of Appeals put a stay on its earlier order—temporarily halting the loss of the charters. NASCAR journalist Bob Pockrass reported:
“As a matter of procedure, the US Court of Appeals issues a stay (a hold) on the reversal of the injunction until the court decides whether there will be a rehearing by the appeals panel or all the 4th circuit judges. If a rehearing, then the stay continues until the decision.”
—Bob Pockrass, NASCAR Insider
This procedural pause means 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports can keep operating as chartered organizations until at least one week after the court makes a final decision on whether to hear the case again. The showdown is now set for the following Tuesday, potentially determining the fate of the current NASCAR charter landscape.
Loss of their charter would deal a crushing blow to both teams. Guaranteeing a spot on the starting grid is crucial for attracting and keeping major sponsors, as well as for ensuring a reliable share of the sport’s sizable purse money. Without a charter, running a full Cup Series schedule at a competitive level could become unsustainable.
Attorney Jeffrey Kessler, representing 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, characterized the suit as a fight for fairness within the sport:
“Our lawsuit is about making NASCAR more competitive and fair. The release provision is just one of many anticompetitive tactics NASCAR has used to preserve its monopoly. We remain fully confident in our case and are committed to racing the full season, regardless of the outcome of this position.”
—Jeffrey Kessler, Attorney
Meanwhile, 23XI’s drivers—Bubba Wallace and Tyler Reddick—have opted to steer clear of commenting on the legal chaos, instead focusing on their on-track goals. Wallace addressed the situation by saying:
“Everything’s great. You know the answer already. You can let Denny [Hamlin] comment on that stuff,”
—Bubba Wallace, Driver
Reddick, too, kept his attention on racing success:
“I’m just going to keep doing my part… and continue winning races,”
—Tyler Reddick, Driver
As the drivers double down on competition, Hamlin and Michael Jordan remain the public faces of a high-profile fight that has captured the entire garage’s attention.
NASCAR’s Countermove: Demanding Full Disclosure from Other Teams
In an unexpected twist, NASCAR has responded to the legal challenge by demanding that all other chartered teams produce extensive financial documents for the court. On June 18, NASCAR filed a motion requesting that the 13 charter-holding teams not named in the lawsuit hand over details about sponsorship income, costs, and profits. Major organizations like Hendrick Motorsports, Team Penske, and Joe Gibbs Racing are among those targeted, raising industry-wide concerns about privacy and competitive exposure.
The sanctioning body insists it needs this information to counter antitrust claims and to demonstrate that the charter system is not harming teams financially:
“Several major components of ‘industry revenues,’ such as team sponsorship revenues, are known only to the individual teams,”
—NASCAR Legal Filing
Team principals, however, worry that sharing detailed sponsor contracts and business data could undermine future deals and disrupt the balance between rivals. While some organizations have pushed to anonymize the data and provide it to a neutral third party, NASCAR rejected that method, insisting on direct court access. This abrupt demand shocked many, particularly as NASCAR previously urged the court to avoid enmeshing other teams in the conflict. Now, however, the legal battle is pulling in almost the entire Cup Series field, with implications for the business relationships of every charter holder.
The Road Ahead: Impact and Uncertainty in NASCAR’s Future
As proceedings head toward a decisive Tuesday hearing, uncertainty looms over not only 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports but also the entire NASCAR community. Denny Hamlin’s bold leadership in this battle has forced the sport to confront foundational questions about fairness, revenue distribution, and who controls the competitive landscape. If the court rules for the teams, the entire charter system may be reshaped, opening the door to increased competition and possibly greater parity among teams.
On the other hand, a ruling in NASCAR’s favor could further entrench the current business structure, leaving teams who challenge the status quo exposed and financially vulnerable. For Hamlin, Michael Jordan, and their allies, the fight is about more than one season—it is an effort to ensure the system gives every organization a genuine shot at success. The outcome will resonate well beyond Denny Hamlin leads 23XI Racing charter battle against NASCAR, setting a precedent for how control and opportunity are brokered in American motorsports for years to come.